Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HAAR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
LAURENCE HAAR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haar v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv03512
Plaintiff:
Douglas Haar
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuthrell v. Haar
as 4:2020cv01107
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lee Cuthrell
Defendant:
Karen Jean Haar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv07406
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HAAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02412
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DENNIS HAAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAAR v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01028
Plaintiff:
MIKAEL HAAR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haar v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mikael Haar
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Anderson v. Haar et al
as 9:2019cv00201
Defendant:
John Doe Persons and Entities 1 through X, James Haar and Beth Haar
Plaintiff:
Neoma Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUGHES et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03070
Plaintiff:
JAMALL RIDEAUX, BRANDON DALCOURT, ROBERT PHILLIPS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02045
Plaintiff:
Jamall Rideaux, Brandon Dalcourt, Robert Phillips and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
