Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Williams v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13056
Plaintiff:
Sonia Laverne Williams
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Luster Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07335
Plaintiff:
Laverne Williams
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18241
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
JESSIE LAVERNE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv16442
Plaintiff:
LAVERNE WILLIAMS, JEREMIAH WILLIAMS and THE ESTATE OF LAVERNE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swann et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2014cv01546
Plaintiff:
Valerie Swann , Sheryl Allen , Brenda Jean Bartley and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08957
Plaintiff:
Laverne Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2010dp20061
Plaintiff:
Laverne Williams and Charlie A. Williams
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
