Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv02151
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lori Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00010
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Lori Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv14164
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
LORI MARTINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jennings et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 4:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Brenda Jennings , Cordella Hyman , Tammy Tupay and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods-Gaston v. Abbott Laboratorie
as 13-662
Plaintiff:
Dorothea Woods-Gaston, Jennifer Rachel Gallant, Chandra Lori Martin and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Laura Anne Bezuidenhout
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Glaxosmithkline LLC, FKA Burroughs Wellcome Co., Carnrick Laboratories, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Eli Lilly and Company, Mallinckrodt Inc., Premo Pharmacuetical Laboratories, Inc., FKA Lemmon Co. of N.J., Inc. and others
Martin et al v. Powerline Freight Systems Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Tara Martin and Lori Martin
Defendant:
Powerline Freight Systems Inc and David Wayne Schaad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods-Gaston et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2010cv01011
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Carnrick Laboratories, Inc., Dart Industries Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Anne Bezuidenhout, Jennifer Rachel Gallant, Chandra Lori Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
