Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Byrne v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John M. Byrne, Jr.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Robert Hunter Biden v. Patrick M. Byrne
as 2:2023cv09430
Plaintiff:
Robert Hunter Biden
Defendant:
Patrick M. Byrne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
BYRNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06720
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M BYRNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tur et al v. Nettleton et al
as 3:2021cv00483
Defendant:
John R. Nettleton, Lara M. Sabanosh and Kelly Wirfel
Plaintiff:
Aline M. Byrnes, Michael F. Tur, Ann Marie Tur and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Abernethy et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12309
Plaintiff:
Kristen Folberth, Christopher Gibbs, Melissa Lawson and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
MOORE v. BYRNES
as 2:2017cv01324
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MOORE
Defendant:
KEVIN M. BYRNES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carlos F Bell v. Alex Kozinsky et al
as 2:2011cv02610
Defendant:
LAPD CH Beck, Atty Gen Gov Jerry Brown, m g Sean J Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos F Bell
Carlos Franklin Bell v. Alex Kozinsky et al
as 2:2011cv00153
Defendant:
AO Fed Ct, AQMD, ARB and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Franklin Bell
Smith v. Garrett et al
as 4:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth Garrett, Joseph Megerman, Trisha Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BYRNE v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv61632
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE M BYRNE
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
