Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42887
Plaintiff:
KAMECA O HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14583
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRED O. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv20789
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JULIUS O HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall et al v. Russell et al
as 4:2016cv01881
Plaintiff:
Maite Marshall and Dylan Marshall
Defendant:
Ben Russell and Harris County Sheriff's Office c/o Harris County Judge Ed Emmett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01989
Plaintiff:
Lee O Harris
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05701
Plaintiff:
Marshaun O. Harris
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71692
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH O. HARRIS
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Barfield et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Susie A Barfield, Tommy G Barton, Sr, Charles R Beard and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Jimmy Thornton and Mike Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Martin v. Harris
as 07-1610
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM L. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD O. HARRIS, in personam, CHERYL P. HARRIS, in personam and THE OIL SCREW FINTASTIC, OFFICIAL NUMBER 587095, her engines, equipment, tackle and apparel, in rem
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
