Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tuition Payer 100 et al v. Bishop of Charleston, The et al
as 2:2021cv00613
Defendant:
Bishop England High School, Tortfeasors 1-10, Bishop of the Diocese of Charleston, The and others
Plaintiff:
Viewed Student Female 200, Tuition Payer 100 and Viewed Student Male 300
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64053
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CAMILA PAYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45590
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S PAYER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cantu et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv08036
Defendant:
Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor, Monsanto Company, UnitedHealthcare Community Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto P Cantu and Maria O. Cantu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Encompass Home and Auto Insurance Company v. Cervera et al
as 2:2014cv02181
Defendant:
Ester Clara Cervera, City of Las Vegas Fire & Rescue, Desert Radiology Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Encompass Home and Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Saba et al v. Clingman et al
as 3:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nawal Saba and Abdallah Saba
Defendant:
Bailey Matthew Clingman, Joshua R. Sine, Ohio Tort Recovery Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Stoecker v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv01029
Plaintiff:
Eileen Stoecker
Defendant:
Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Payer et al v. Olson
as 8:2007cv00231
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Payer and David G. Payer
Defendant:
Andrew Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
