Cases 101 - 110 of 196
Linsalata et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2015cv01189
Plaintiff:
Jason Birnhak, David Fensterstock and Anthony Linsalata
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, Inc., Target Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Lee
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv60354
Plaintiff:
Louise Williams and Maria Valdez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and NBTY, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
MYERS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
ERIKA STROJNY MYERS
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lowe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2015cv04030
Plaintiff:
Sherri Lowe
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mager v. GNC Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00267
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and NBTY. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dave Mager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 2:2015cv04027
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Stokes
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clement v. Stanley Access Technologies L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00266
Plaintiff:
Rita Clement
Defendant:
Stanley Access Technologies L L C and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Figueiredo, et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Rafael Figueiredo and Dale Kardasz
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2015cv01182
Plaintiff:
Robin Chrystal Hale and Kaitlyn Pirtle
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., GNC Holdings, Inc. , Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
