Cases 21 - 27 of 27
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT INTEREST AT LLYOD'S OF LONDON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT INTEREST AT LLYOD'S OF LONDON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC.
as 3:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
WATSONTOWN TRUCKING COMPANY , JAMES A. BENGE , ENVER BECIREVIC and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREAT WEST CASUALTY CO. v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY CO.
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. and GUFFIE SWINK
Thirdparty_defendant:
WATSONTOWN TRUCKING COMPANY , JAMES A. BENGE , ENVER BECIREVIC and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. and GUFFIE SWINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SENTRY SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 4:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
SENTRY SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
M&N Aviation, Inc. v. United Parcel Service et al
as 3:2010cv01137
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, UPS Worldwide Fowarding Service, Inc and UPS Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
M&N Aviation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Omnitek Dental Ceramics, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00833
Plaintiff:
Omnitek Dental Ceramics, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc, ., United Parcel Service, Inc, . and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Narkiewicz-Laine v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
as 3:2008cv50259
Plaintiff:
Christian K. Narkiewicz-Laine
Defendant:
United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
