Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Mantikas v. Kellogg Company
as 17-2011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kristen Mantikas, Kristin Burns and Linda Castle, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Kellogg Company
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55892
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
JAMES STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
CEMIL HOPE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
GAY HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Burns v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2017cv11748
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C. , Homewood Home Residential Mortgage , AMC Mortgage Service, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Burns
Gray, et al v. City of Revere, et al
as 1:2016cv10580
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gray and Marie A. Gray
Defendant:
City of Revere, Brian Arrigo, Paul Capizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gray, et al v. City of Revere, et al
as 16-2374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS GRAY and MARIE A. GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
REVERE, MA, BRIAN ARRIGO, Mayor, City of Revere, PAUL CAPIZZI, City Solicitor and others
Burns v. Mitchell
as 8:2016cv03274
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Burns, Sr.
Defendant:
Lynndolyn Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burns v. Montgomery County Police Department
as 8:2016cv03222
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dennis Burns, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
