Cases 61 - 70 of 86
Currie v. Citi Mortgage
as 3:2014cv02151
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Currie
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curry v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01207
Plaintiff:
Bryan Curry
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01206
Plaintiff:
Terry Curry
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bochenski v. Curry et al
as 1:2014cv02780
Plaintiff:
Michael Bochenski
Defendant:
Laura Curry, Brian Moffet and M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gege Odion v. Google Inc., et al
as 14-12394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEGE ODION, individually, and, d.b.a. Siris Property Management, LLC, d.b.a. Optiworld Vision Center
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE INC., JAMES P. BLUM, JR., CYNTHIA D. WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
SERVICE
EFT Holdings, Inc. vs. George Curry
as 2:2014cv02667
Counter Claimant:
George Curry
Defendant:
George Curry
Counter Defendant:
EFT Holdings, Inc, Jack Qin and Pyng Soon
Plaintiff:
EFT Holdings, Inc.
Odion v. Google Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03906
Plaintiff:
Gege Odion
Defendant:
Google Inc. , James P. Blum, Jr. , Cynthia D. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Leonard-Rufus El et al v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 8:2013cv03056
Plaintiff:
Brenda Leonard-Rufus El and Rahn Edward Rufus El
Defendant:
OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC, US Mortgage Finance Corporation, MERS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
In Re: Bayer Corp. Combination
as 13-1939
Plaintiff - Appellee:
1:08-cv-04623-BMC Goldberg et al v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al, If you represent a plaintiff(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case, 1:09-cv-00496-BMC Gasawau et al v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al, If you represent a plaintiff(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case, 1:09-cv-01543-BMC-JMA Nosbisch v. Bayer AG et al, If you represent a plaintiff(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case and others
Defendant - Appellee:
1:08-cv-04623-BMC Goldberg et al v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al, If you represent a defendant(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case, 1:09-cv-00496-BMC Gasawau et al v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al, If you represent a defendant(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case, 1:09-cv-01543-BMC-JMA Nosbisch v. Bayer AG et al, If you represent a defendant(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case and others
Objector - Appellant:
Janis Johnson and Shelley Stevens
In Re: Bayer Corp. Combination
as 13-1928
Plaintiff - Appellee:
1:08-cv-04623-BMC Goldberg et al v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al, If you represent a plaintiff(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case, 1:09-cv-00496-BMC Gasawau et al v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al, If you represent a plaintiff(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case, 1:09-cv-01543-BMC-JMA Nosbisch v. Bayer AG et al, If you represent a plaintiff(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case and others
Defendant - Appellee:
1:08-cv-04623-BMC Goldberg et al v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al, If you represent a defendant(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case, 1:09-cv-00496-BMC Gasawau et al v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al, If you represent a defendant(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case, 1:09-cv-01543-BMC-JMA Nosbisch v. Bayer AG et al, If you represent a defendant(s) in this line case, select this party when you make your e-filing on this MDL case and others
Objector:
Janis Johnson
Objector - Appellant:
Shelley Stevens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
