Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1225
Not Yet Classified:
In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFFS, CITY OF BENWOOD, CITY OF BROCKTON and others
Appellant:
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, now known as EIDP, Inc. and others
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv03085
Plaintiff:
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
City of Fairborn v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
City of Fairborn
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03348
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS INC., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Aqua North Carolina, Inc. v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv02142
Plaintiff:
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amrex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nessel et al v. Chemguard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00373
Defendant:
Verde Environmental, Inc., Denko, Inc., Rockwood Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nessel et al v. Chemguard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01080
Defendant:
Vulcan Fire Systems, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Dawn Chemical Corporation of Wisconsin, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel, State of Michigan and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
