Cases 1 - 10 of 19
In re: Avandia Marketing
as 13-3462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL MORGAN, JR., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, DBA GlaxoSmithKline
Laurino v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
as 4:2012cv00932
Plaintiff:
Staci Laurino
Defendant:
Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Schering-Plough Corp., et al
as 11-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCHERING CORPORATION, SCHERING PLOUGH CORP and WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., BARR LABORATORIES, INC., DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Interested Party:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Schering-Plough Corp., et al
as 11-2264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant - Appellant:
SCHERING PLOUGH CORP, SCHERING CORPORATION and WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., BARR LABORATORIES, INC., DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Interested Party:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv04478
Plaintiff:
Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund , North Jersey Municipal Employee Benefits Fund , Southern New Jersey Regional Employee Benefits Fund and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MORGAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 5:2010cv02401
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MORGAN, JR.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GURNEY et al v. GLAXO SMITH KLINE et al
as 2:2009cv05597
Plaintiff:
JANICE GURNEY and KENNETH GURNEY
Defendant:
GLAXO SMITH KLINE and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KAPLAR et al v. GLAXO SMITH KLINE et al
as 2:2009cv05598
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS KAPLAR and BROWN KAPLAR
Defendant:
GLAXO SMITH KLINE and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIDDOWAY et al v. GLAXO SMITH KLINE et al
as 2:2009cv05599
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIDDOWAY and SANDRA SIDDOWAY
Defendant:
GLAXO SMITH KLINE and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Siddoway et al v. Glaxo Smith Kline et al
as 2:2009cv00387
Plaintiff:
John Siddoway and Sandra Siddoway
Defendant:
Glaxo Smith Kline and SmithKline Beecham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
