Cases 101 - 110 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01699
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hill et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2020cv02873
Defendant:
Larry Reech, Unidentified Parties, Joseph Lopinto, III and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Isaiah Evans, Ratrell Hill and Dantriel Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Uriarte et al v. Metropolitan Transit System et al
as 3:2020cv01576
Plaintiff:
Jose Uriarte and Matthew Bortz
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Metropolitan Transit System, Universal Protection Service, GP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01475
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 sh
Avila et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020at00673
Defendant:
Lorenzo Vidales, JMA Ventures, LLC, Universal Protection Service, LP and others
Petitioner:
Mark Matthews
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01376
Defendant:
Lorenzo Vidales, JMA Ventures, LLC, Sacramento Downtown Arena, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Avila and Mark Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinnett v. Regional Transportation District et al
as 1:2020cv01052
Defendant:
Regional Transportation District, Aaron Fougere, Universal Protection Service, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Raverro Stinnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
