Cases 121 - 130 of 985
Grant v. Norton et al
as 4:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Carla Grant
Defendant:
Bradley Norton, United States of America and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vasquez v. VNA Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03091
Plaintiff:
Carla A. Vasquez
Defendant:
VNA HEATHCARE, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Louis Holger Eklund, et al v. Sharon Gleason, et al
as 22-35446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
Plaintiff:
ALASKA NATIVE CHILDREN & FAMILIES
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON L. GLEASON, JONAS M. WALKER, BRYAN SCHRODER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Dutschmann v. Life Care Services et al
as 6:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Wanda Dutschmann and Marcie Schreck
Defendant:
Life Care Services, City of Waco, Mayor Dillon Meek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Ciraci, et al v. J.M. Smucker Company
as 22-3462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. CIRACI, CARLA GROSJEAN, ANDY S. RUEGG and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE CROOKSTON and CHRISTOPHER CONRAD
Defendant / Appellee:
J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY
Willis Annis v. Debra Kempi, et al
as 22-15737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIS BOYD ANNIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA K. KEMPI, WILLIAM G. COBB, CARLA BALDWIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
