Cases 121 - 130 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-15642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bettelyoun et al v. Espinoza et al
as 6:2008cv06063
Plaintiff:
Richard Leonard Bettelyoun and Kimberly Bettelyoun
Defendant:
Mike Espinoza, Cory Chase, Nathan Garibay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lambeth v. Miller et al
as 2:2008cv02069
Plaintiff:
Danny Lambeth
Defendant:
Debra L. Miller , Alter Trading Corporation , Gibson's Recycling Ii and others
Counter_claimant:
Gibson's Recycling Ii
Counter_defendant:
Danny Lambeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Stiles v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.
as 8:2007cv01447
Plaintiff:
Connie Stiles
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAHER et al v. RENNINGER et al
as 2:2007cv02979
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P. MAHER and JUL' A. D'ANCONA-MAHER
Defendant:
JEFFREY RENNINGER, CHIEF OF POLICE ALLEN W. STILES, THE TOWNSHIP OF SALISBURY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
STILES et al v. TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE et al
as 3:2007cv02933
Plaintiff:
NANCY STILES and WAYNE STILES
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE, OLD BRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and RICHARD ROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
