Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Bailey v. Ortman
as 3:2022cv50254
Plaintiff:
Latonqua Bailey
Defendant:
James C Ortman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Moore v. Illinois Board of Election et al
as 1:2022cv03432
Plaintiff:
Gregg Moore
Defendant:
Illinois Board of Election, Ian K. Linnabary and Darien Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
El v. Hayden et al
as 1:2021cv01326
Plaintiff:
Nizza P El
Defendant:
John Hayden, SGT Bell, Officer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Protesters in Support of Black Lives et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv06851
Defendant:
#18659 Levon London, #19896 R. A. Ayala, #351 Patricia Zuber and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Vail, Protesters in Support of Black Lives, Jeannine Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blaylock et al v. Twin Restaurant, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04648
Plaintiff:
Rachel Anderson, Susan Winfield, Johnae Farr and others
Defendant:
Twin Restaurant Franchise, LLC, Twin Restaurant Warrenville, LLC, Twin Restaurant Investment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Bailey v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv04168
Defendant:
Department of Buildings, City Of Chicago and Corporation Counsel
Plaintiff:
Melvin Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Pritzker
as 3:2020cv00474
Plaintiff:
Darren Bailey
Defendant:
Governor Jay Robert Pritzker
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Richter v. Pogose et al
as 1:2019cv07156
Defendant:
Brandon Bailey, Will County, Jeffrey Pogose and others
Plaintiff:
Winfred Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
