Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Brill v. Commonwealth Clinical Group et al
as 1:2021cv01331
Plaintiff:
Janet Brill
Defendant:
Commonwealth Clinical Group, Christina Ludwig, Jonathan M. Gransee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brill v. Livaditis
as 1:2021cv00596
Defendant:
Dorothy Livaditis
Plaintiff:
Janet G. Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Williams v. King et al
as 1:2019cv04856
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Janet King, Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield, III and Magistrate Judge Gerrilyn G. Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Grand Canyon University et al
as 2:2019cv00463
Defendant:
Schern Richardson Finter PLC, Margaret H. Downie, Michael Schern and others
Plaintiff:
Harland Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony A. Patel v. Charles Robinson et al
as 2:2019cv02851
Defendant:
Charles Robinson, Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump and Aldisert LLP, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Patel and Anthony A Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KARKALAS v. MARKS et al
as 2:2019cv00948
Defendant:
LINDA MARKS and KIMBERLY BRILL
Plaintiff:
ELIAS KARKALAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Kim
as 1:2018cv00445
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Armstrong, Elwood Andrews, Jay Turkovsky and others
Defendant:
Joe Kamelamela, Wil Okabe, William B. Long and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lee Maniscalco, Geraldine Lee Tobin, William E. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
