Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv04198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sanchez, et al v. Guzman, et al
as 22-1322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTA SANCHEZ, THE ESTATE OF STEPHANIE LOPEZ and DOMINIC MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY GUZMAN, LUKE MCGRATH, JOSEPH CARNS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CARNES v. GORE et al
as 1:2022cv02521
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES
Defendant:
ALBERT - GORE, WARREN ELIZABETH, PEGGY CATERWARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNES v. BREY
as 1:2022cv02519
Defendant:
PATTY BREY and LISA CARNE
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNES v. U.S. ARMY et al
as 1:2022cv02520
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY, ARMY RESEARCH, FORT BLISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
William Windsor v. B. Grutby, et al
as 22-12411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant / Appellee:
B. GRUTBY, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., ORINDA D. EVANS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Appellee:
MAID OF THE MIST CORPORATION and MAID OF THE MIST STEAMBOAT COMPANY, LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
