Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Stewart v. City Of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv05499
Plaintiff: Malik Stewart and Daniel Jones
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, Julio Tavarez, David Callan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00938
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Curry v. County of Clayton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv04379
Plaintiff: Debra Denise Curry
Defendant: County of Clayton, Terry Baskin, Tomisha Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAPI et al v. TOWN OF GORHAM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00560
Plaintiff: JOHN PAPI and JOHN J PAPI LLC
Defendant: TOWN OF GORHAM, TOWN OF GORHAM TOWN COUNCIL, TOWN OF GORHAM TOWN CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Jones v. Officer Flowers et al
as 1:2016cv05276
Plaintiff: Daniel Jones
Movant: Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant: Officer Flowers, Officer Daniels and Village of Maywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01203
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jones et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04036
Plaintiff: Danielle Jones
Defendant: City of New York, Rodney Jiles, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. HALL et al
as 3:2014cv00149
Plaintiff: SUMMER DANIELLE JONES
Defendant: WENDALL HALL and CLIFTON WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jeffery Douglas v. Danielle Jones, et al
as 13-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFERY G. DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee: DANIELLE JONES, STATE OF TENNESSEE, DONALD H. ALLEN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?