Cases 11 - 20 of 218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
GAGE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al
as 3:2023cv21264
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SHAWN M. LATOURETTE, CHRISTOPHER SQUAZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gage v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust et al
as 5:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Russell Gage
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust, Breonna R Thompson, Bobby Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mills v. City of Winona et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Murray Mills
Defendant:
City of Winona, Officer James Burnett, Officer Orlando Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Greg Gardner v. Laura McCullough, et al
as 23-10809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREG GARDNER
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA MCCULLOUGH, JOSHUA GAGE BARKER, JACOB LANE-ALLEN HEATHERLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
