Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Wright v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv03008
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Wright
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Robert Gates, Eric Shinseki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jenkins v. Industrial Chemicals Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03895
Plaintiff:
Cory Jenkins
Defendant:
Industrial Chemicals Inc and William L Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Welch v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2012cv01346
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Welch
Defendant:
City of Peoria, Brian E Grice, Anthony D Rummans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Natalie Hornbeak-Denton, et al v. Gary Myers, et al
as 08-6382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATALIE HORNBEAK-DENTON and ANNE HORNBEAK
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY T. MYERS, TWRA Executive Director, individually and in his official capacity, JOHN C. GREGORY, TWRA Chief of Real Estate and Forestry, individually and in his official capacity, R. B. "BUDDY" BAIRD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shipley v. Cottril et al
as 2:2008cv00240
Plaintiff:
Donald I. Shipley
Defendant:
Kelly J. Cottrill, Kevin Van Horn, James E Workman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hornbeak-Denton et al v. Myers et al
as 1:2007cv01189
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hornbeak-Denton, Natalie Hornbeak-Denton, Ann Hornbeak and others
Defendant:
Gary T. Myers, John C. Gregory, Michael Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
