Cases 11 - 16 of 16
James Obergefell, et al v. Richard Hodges, et al
as 14-3057
Amicus Curiae:
WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, GARY J. GATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID BRIAN MICHENER, ROBERT GRUNN, JAMES OBERGEFELL and others
Defendant:
CAMILLE JONES
Intervenor:
CRAIG SCHEIDLER, EQUALITY OHIO, SARAH RUTH MARSHALL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE WYMYSLO, MD, In his official capacity as the Director of the Ohio Department of Health, LANCE D. HIMES, In his official capacity as the Interim Director of The Ohio Department of Health and RICHARD HODGES
Nickerson-Reti, et al v. Lexington Public Schools, et al
as 12-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA NICKERSON-RETI and CURTIS RETI
Defendant - Appellee:
LEXINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MINUTEMAN REGIONAL CAREER & TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION and others
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MITCHELL D. CHESTER, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education, LEXINGTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE and others
Rudolph Babcock v. City of Conneaut, et al
as 10-4319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDOLPH BABCOCK, aka Rudloph Babcock
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CONNEAUT, JOHN WILLIAMS, LAWRENCE E. GASCH and others
Babcock
as 1:2009cv01849
Plaintiff:
Rudloph Babcock
Defendant:
City of Conneaut, John Williams, Lawrence E Gasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schwartz v. Conneaut Ohio, The City of et al
as 1:2009cv01222
Plaintiff:
Kathryn M. Schwartz
Defendant:
Conneaut Ohio, The City of, Robert A. Schaumleffel, Jr. and Lori B. Lamer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 sp Job Discrimination (Sex Preference)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
