Cases 11 - 20 of 44
GORA v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
NICOLE GORA
Defendant:
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY, SHERIFF ERIC SAMPSON, JOHN GUAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEWES v. PUSHARD et al
as 1:2021cv00125
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JACKIE PUSHARD, BENJAMIN PUSHARD and others
Plaintiff:
LIBBY HEWES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESCOTT et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv00072
Defendant:
MARY ANN SAAR, JEFFREY HAWKINS, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WESCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORGENSEN v DUNLAP
as 1:2020cv00272
Plaintiff:
JO JORGENSEN
Defendant:
MATTHEW DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAGOPIAN et al v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2020cv00257
Plaintiff:
DUANE R LANDER, ROBERT HAGOPIAN, JAMES T TRUDEL and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW DUNLAP, JANET MILLS and AARON FREY
Amicus Curiae:
MIKE TURCOTTE and PRINCETON ELECTORAL INNOVATION LAB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERRILL et al v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2020cv00248
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, KATHERINE JONES, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL PEABODY, PAULINE LAMONTAGNE, LYNN MERRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BOND v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2020cv00216
Defendant:
TROY JACKSON, MATTHEW DUNLAP, JANET MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY BOND
Petitioner:
ETHAN WELD ALCORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION INC v. DUNLAP
as 1:2020cv00061
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION INC
Defendant:
MATTHEW DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00537
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BAINES et al v. DUNLAP
as 1:2019cv00509
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAINES, CODY BLACKBURN, CHRISTOPHER LYONS and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
