Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 690
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2028
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Wensley-Garcia v. Mountbatten et al
as 3:2024cv01899
Plaintiff: Colleen Marie Wensley-Garcia, Tracy Dunn and Grace Victoria Mountbatten
Defendant: Charles Mountbatten, Fiona Irinka Strauss, Lavaughn Irene Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmalshof et al v. McDonough County, Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff: Evan Schmalshof and Schmalshof Family Transport LLC
Defendant: McDonough County, Illinois and Nicholas Petitgout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MAJORS v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff: DARRYL MAJORS
Defendant: DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
MARTIN v. MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: MALIK N MARTIN
Defendant: MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, TAMARTHA LAMBERT, BRANDI MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01669
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03556
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SOOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: EMERY SOOS
Defendant: DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and WALT C. DANNENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SWANSON v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SWANSON
Defendant: DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?