Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sayger v. AssuredPartners, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05756
Defendant:
Mark Ritchie, AssuredPartners Jamison LLC, AssuredPartners NL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Sayger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 sh Diversity-Sexual Harassment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv13697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Kluchin et al v. City of Beachwood, et al
as 1:2018cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael Levin and James Kluchin
Defendant:
Merle Gordon, Michael Anderson, Gary Haba and others
Debtor:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andreyev v. Rawe et al
as 2:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Andreyev
Defendant:
David Rawe, Gregory Cole, Cameron Bal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Anthony et al
as 1:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jordan Cooley
Defendant:
Moyra Anthony, Doug Fridel, Jessica Moorhead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Ward, et al v. John Hellerstedt
as 17-50899
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH WARD, by his next friend Frances Bourliot, MICHAEL ANDERSON, by his next friend Phil Campbell, ISAAC LEMELLE, by his next friend Mark Westenhover and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DR. JOHN HELLERSTEDT, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
