Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Saito v. Collier County Municipal Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Lynnea Saito and Koichi Saito
Defendant:
Collier County Municipal Corporation, Collier County Sheriff's Office, Charles Nunley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Richardson v. Lall et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Raymond Remell Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge J. Jessy Lall, Sergeant Francious, M.P. Officer Strout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moffett et al v. Brookside, Town of et al
as 2:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Michelle Moffett and Kiera Moffett
Defendant:
Brookside, Town of and Ivory Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Blevens et al v. Kentucky State Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
David Gene Blevens and McKinzie Marshall
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police Department, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Sergeant Dallas Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
