Cases 11 - 20 of 172
CALHOUN v. TOMLINSON et al
as 4:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
VENITA ODESSIA CALHOUN
Defendant:
JOHN CASON, FRITO-LAY, RON SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garza Alvarez v. City of Roswell et al
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Garza Alvarez
Defendant:
City of Roswell , Ron Smith , Tracy Oldani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 16-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville
as 14-7180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Jacobs et al v. Iredell County et al
as 5:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Cindi Jacobs and Maureen Wilcox
Defendant:
Iredell County, Christine Royal, Ron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 14-6302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. J. Barefoot
as 14-6220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BAREFOOT, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
