Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Stanke v. The Top C.I.A. Official Eugene Oregon
as 6:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Stanke
Defendant:
The Learning Center and The Top C.I.A. Official Eugene Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Motan v. C.I.A.
as 4:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
Abeer Motan
Defendant:
C.I.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Notz v. The United States Government et al
as 5:2014cv00557
Plaintiff:
Arthur M. Notz, III
Defendant:
The United States Government, The F.B.I., Richard Dent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaMonaco v. Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.)
as 1:2014cv05857
Plaintiff:
Salvatore LaMonaco
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raoul v. City of New York Police Department (NYPD) et al
as 1:2014cv00680
Plaintiff:
David Raoul
Defendant:
City of New York Police Department (NYPD), Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.), Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gamache v. Unknown Defendant
as 4:2010cv03256
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gamache
Defendant:
The C.I.A., The FBI, The Russian Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WALTERS v. C.I.A. - C.I.S. et al
as 2:2009cv00633
Plaintiff:
ART WALTERS
Defendant:
C.I.A. - C.I.S., MARRIOTT CORP. and D. TRUMP, INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. C.I.A. Employers et al
as 2:2008cv04075
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Kennedy
Defendant:
C.I.A. Employers and C.I.A. Employees
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fennick v. George W. Bush Administration et al
as 1:2008cv07119
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fennick
Defendant:
George W. Bush Administration, Office of Attorney General, C.I.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. U.S. President et al
as 2:2008cv02500
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patrick Kennedy
Defendant:
U.S. President and C.I.A. Employees
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
