Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Coffee County et al
as 5:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Lindsey Griswold, Linda Canty, Jeffrey Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Torrey Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv23601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Simmons v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2018cv13812
Plaintiff:
Latausha Simmons
Defendant:
Norman White, Director of City of Detroit Parking Violations Bureau, Manager of City of Detroit Parking Violations Bureau and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv12985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 18-15673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Friess et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2017cv14139
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Duncan Solutions, Inc., James Lamont Canty and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Friess and Issa Ghaleb Haddad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 17-17401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Herrera Bernal v. Canty et al
as 0:2017cv62286
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Jamila Z. Canty, Eduardo Baldisieso Bascope, Andrew Matthew Coffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dydzak v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, Matthew C. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
