Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Galey v. Erb et al
as 5:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Phillip C Galey
Defendant:
Ken Erb and Gale Waldrop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Walker v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2016cv06053
Plaintiff:
Carol Walker
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco and Justin Erb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Hummel v. Roebuck et al
as 5:2016cv00038
Defendant:
California State Deputy Attorney General, Janet Erb and Amy M Roebuck
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hummel
COLE v. MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE et al
as 2:2015cv01579
Plaintiff:
KENNETH D. COLE
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE , DIANE ALLISON , BERNARD ERB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Welsandt-Burchett v. Haynes/The Dump Furniture Co. et al
as 1:2015cv02421
Plaintiff:
Lori Welsandt-Burchett
Defendant:
Haynes/The Dump Furniture Co., New Venture Holdings, LLC, The Dump Furniture Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADVANTAGE POINT, LP v. BOROUGH OF KUTZTOWN et al
as 5:2014cv05517
Plaintiff:
ADVANTAGE POINT, LP
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF KUTZTOWN , KUTZTOWN MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY , PEGGY DEVLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schweitzer v. Skelly, et al
as 14-4016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE L. SCHWEITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
JON SKELLY, NICHOLAS LAFEBER and KAREN ERB
Defendant:
FNU, LNU, Current Director of the Salt Lake City Regional Office of the Department of Veterans Affairs
Woodrow v. County of Merced et al
as 1:2013cv01505
Plaintiff:
Channon Woodrow
Defendant:
County of Merced, Walter Wall, Anna Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
