Cases 21 - 30 of 500
Bartula v. Michael Gatwood et al
as 1:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Richard Bartula
Defendant:
Hancock County, Mississippi, Ricky Adam, Michael Gatwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Robinson v. Hancock Whitney Bank
as 2:2023cv04418
Plaintiff:
Lacie Robinson
Defendant:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Winkley et al v. Hancock County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Dwight Winkley, Cathy Winkley, Danielle Winkley Hutchinson and others
Defendant:
Hancock County, Mississippi, Ricky Adam, Michael Chase Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morales v. Hancock County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Steve Morales
Defendant:
Hancock County Sheriff's Department, Hancock County, Colin Ladner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carl Long v. Jason Kander, et al
as 23-2706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Edward Long
Defendant / Appellee:
Jason Kander, Jordan R. Berges, Darryl Forte and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Emke v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Nolan Lanier Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
