Cases 21 - 30 of 2,572
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Betty Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner Ruth Naglich, Warden Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bakutis v. Dean
as 24-10271
Plaintiff:
Guardian Ad Litem and David Bakutis, as Temporary Administrator for the Estate of Atatiana Jefferson
Defendant:
Aaron Dean
Dees (PS) et al v. Hood et al
as 1:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Dees and Ethan D. Smith
Defendant:
William Hood, Alexis King, Christopher Zenisek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Jefferson County Department of Job & Family Services et al
as 2:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
David Powell
Defendant:
Jefferson County Department of Job & Family Services, ODJFS, Ohio Medicaid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Anderl (PS) v. Owens et al
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Darla Anderl
Defendant:
Beth Owens, Libby, Maryisol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12134 Americans with Disabilities Act (IDEA) Education
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Oravetz v. Jefferson County Sheriffs et al
as 6:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs and Washinton State MSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
