Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 25 of 25
James Moss v. Scott Sutton
as 09-1305
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMES DAVID MOSS, JAMES LLOYD MOSS and MARTHA GEAN MOSS
Defendant - Appellant: SCOTT SUTTON, Individually and as Chief of the Maggie Valley Police Department, JEFFREY N MACKEY, Individually and as an Officer of the Maggie Valley Police Department, TOWN OF MAGGIE VALLEY and others
Defendant - None: BRIAN E SIZEMORE, Individually and as a Deputy of the Haywood County Sheriff's Department, MAGGIE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAYWOOD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Stennie Meadours, et al v. Steven Ermel, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-20150
Plaintiff - Appellant: STENNIE MEADOURS, Individually and as Person Representative of the Estate of Robert Meadours and BRUCE MEADOURS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Meadours
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN R ERMEL, JEFFREY DALTON, JEFFREY N KOMINEK and others
James Moss v. Scott Sutton
as 09-1272
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DAVID MOSS, JAMES LLOYD MOSS and MARTHA GEAN MOSS
Defendant - Appellee: SCOTT SUTTON, Individually and as Chief of the Maggie Valley Police Department, JEFFREY N MACKEY, Individually and as an Officer of the Maggie Valley Police Department, TOWN OF MAGGIE VALLEY and others
Defendant - None: BRIAN E SIZEMORE, Individually and as a Deputy of the Haywood County Sheriff's Department, MAGGIE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAYWOOD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01293
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Moss et al v. Mackey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00135
Plaintiff: James David Moss, James Lloyd Moss and Martha Gean Moss
Defendant: Jeffrey N. Mackey, Scott Sutton, Town of Maggie Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?