Cases 21 - 30 of 1,371
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Joplin v. Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Joplin
Defendant:
Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-60156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wensley-Garcia v. Mountbatten et al
as 3:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Colleen Marie Wensley-Garcia, Tracy Dunn and Grace Victoria Mountbatten
Defendant:
Charles Mountbatten, Fiona Irinka Strauss, Lavaughn Irene Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Dynamic Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B. Williams v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2024cv02439
Plaintiff:
B. Williams
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, National Eagle Security, Inc., Jean Baptiste Akre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Ivey (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Alabama Department of Human Resources Food Stamp Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Money v. City of San Marcos
as 24-50187
Plaintiff:
Kristy Kay Money and Rolf Jacob Sraubhaar
Defendant:
City of San Marcos and Amanda Hernandez, in her official capacity as Director of Planning and Development Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
