Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Michael Snipes v. Volusia County
as 16-14221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD SNIPES
Defendant - Appellee:
VOLUSIA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kenneth Camp, et al v. City of Pelham
as 14-14804
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMP, MICHAEL TODD MCCARVER, PATRICK SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PELHAM
Snipes v. Volusia County
as 6:2014cv00413
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Snipes
Defendant:
Volusia County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Young v. Michael Simpson, et al
as 13-13361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE T. YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL TODD SIMPSON, Individually, KENNY ELLIS, Individually, JASON DIXON, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Barber et al v. Bice et al
as 2:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
Albert Barber, Jr. , Carol Barber , Michael Todd and others
Defendant:
Tommy Bice , Ed Richardson and State Board of Education, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Simpson et al
as 2:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Joe T. Young
Defendant:
Michael Todd Simpson, Kenny Ellis, Jason Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camp et al v. City of Pelham
as 2:2010cv01270
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Camp , Michael Todd McCarver , Patrick Smith and others
Defendant:
City of Pelham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
