Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Dockery v. Tunica County, Mississippi
as 3:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Dockery
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tommy Lee Stevens v. Unknown Name Employee(s)
as 15-1850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY LEE STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN NAME EMPLOYEE(S) OF US POSTAL SERVICE
Stevens v. Unknown named employees of the Department of Health and Human Servies et al
as 5:2014cv00810
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Unknown named employees of the Department of Health and Human Servies and State of North Carolina Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steward v. Kaufman County, Texas
as 3:2014cv03685
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Steward
Defendant:
Kaufman County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Imperial Polk County et al
as 8:2014cv02477
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Green
Defendant:
Imperial Polk County, Robert C. Wilkinson, Jr., Kristina Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullar v. City of Orlando, Florida et al
as 6:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Cullar
Defendant:
City of Orlando, Florida, The Center for Drug Free Living, Buddy Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henre et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2014cv02096
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Henre, Sr. and Wilma K. Henre
Defendant:
Jason Allen, William Bais, B. Bunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00279
Petitioner:
TOMMY LEE STEVENS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy Stevens v. Unknown Name Employee(s) of US
as 13-1564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY LEE STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN NAME EMPLOYEE(S) OF US POSTAL SERVICE
Stevens v. Unknown Name Employee(s) of US Postal Service
as 5:2012cv00451
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Unknown Name Employee(s) of US Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
