Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Wilson v. Judicial Council of California, Superior Court of California for the County of Marin (MC Court) et al
as 4:2020cv06764
Defendant:
Paul Miller Haakenson (SBN 167513), James M. Kim, Damien Berkes Troutman (SBN 286616) and others
Plaintiff:
Micheal Geary Wilson and Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1683
Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School District/Special Education Local Plan Area (Diablo) et al
as 3:2020cv03368
Defendant:
City of Concord, Jose A. Espinoza, Darryl R. Saffold and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Leigh Law Group, P.C, (LLG) et al
as 3:2020cv03045
Defendant:
Brian Lawrence, Fagen, Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP (F3), Alison Paige Buchanan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leigh et al v. Wilson
as 5:2020cv04372
Defendant:
Michael Geary Wilson
Plaintiff:
Mandy Gina Leigh, Leigh Law Group, P.C., Jay Toivo Jambeck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TROUTMAN v. SAN JOES CANTINA & GRILL LLC
as 1:2020cv00008
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE TROUTMAN
Defendant:
SAN JOES CANTINA GRILL LLC and SAN JOES CANTINA & GRILL LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04273
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
