Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Dolly Kiosea v. Culver City et al
as 2:2019cv02649
Defendant:
Chief of Police Scott Bixby, Ivan Hernandez, Michael Vanhook and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Dolly Kiosea and Dolly Kiosea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Allen et al v. Vitale et al
as 1:2018cv03591
Plaintiff:
Taz Allen and William Brown
Defendant:
Craig Vitale, NYC , Fran Siciliano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. Lackawanna County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2018cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Allen
Defendant:
Lackawanna County Board of Commissioners , William Browning , Brian Loughney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv05818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Frantz Bernard, et al v. East Stroudsburg University, et al
as 16-1598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANTZ BERNARD, TIMOTHEUS HOMAS and ANTHONY ROSS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEJEAN MURRAY, WILLIAM BROWN and JERRY SALTER
Defendant - Appellee:
EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY
William Brown, Jr. v. Craig Myers
as 16-1122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM BROWN, JR.
Plaintiff:
B & M HITECH ELECTRIC
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG MYERS, DAVID BROWN, DAVID COLLINS and others
William Brown, Jr. v. Craig Myer
as 16-1122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM BROWN, JR.
Plaintiff:
B & M HITECH ELECTRIC
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG MYERS, DAVID BROWN, DAVID COLLINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
