Cases 21 - 30 of 975
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Kyla Warner
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Donna Cooper v. Chief Financial Officer of Florida, et al
as 23-13739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA COOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF FLORIDA and MICHAEL WARNER
Warner v. Lund, et al
as 23-2187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
KATIE G. LUND, LISA ABEYTA, ANDRE BILLINGSLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
