Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Wright v. Task Force Officer Jeffrey C. Taylor et al
as 1:2011cv00478
Defendant:
Assistant United States Attorney Seth Weber, Esq., Detective Billera, Detective Fey and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv05368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
OSU Student Alliance, et al v. Ed Ray, et al
as 10-35555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSU STUDENT ALLIANCE and WILLIAM ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ED RAY, MARK MCCAMBRIDGE, LARRY ROPER and others
Jenkins v. Rogers
as 3:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
John Jenkins
Defendant:
William Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunsucker v. Tippah County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dale Hunsucker, Jr.
Defendant:
Tippah County, Mississippi, Jeffery Rogers and William Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Qasem v. Toro et al
as 1:2009cv08361
Plaintiff:
Gultela Qasem and Gultela Qasem
Defendant:
Luis A. Toro, Delores Thornton, William Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OSU Student Alliance et al v. Ray et al
as 6:2009cv06269
Plaintiff:
OSU Student Alliance and William Rogers
Defendant:
Ed Ray, Mark McCambridge, Larry Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Schell v. Prindle et al
as 2:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
William L. Schell and William L. Schell
Defendant:
Edward Prindle, Boone County, Kentucky, Ed Prindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
