Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Bailey v. Wood et al
as 1:2013cv02442
Plaintiff:
Stacy Bailey
Defendant:
E. Scott Wood , Robert Merchant and The City of Canton, Georgia
Cheeks et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
Landres Cheeks , Cleotha Williams , L.C. Slaughter and others
Defendant:
London Smith , Miriam Coury , Jewell Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Bartlett v. Harless et al
as 5:2012cv01366
Plaintiff:
William E. Bartlett
Defendant:
Daniel R. Harless , Mark A. Diels , City of Canton, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanier v. Drake et al
as 1:2012cv00410
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc. f/k/a Prison Health Services, Inc., d/b/a PHS Correctional Healthcare, Northside Hospital - Cherokee, Inc. doing business as Northside Hospital Cherokee, Shane Ladner and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Lanier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lousteau v. City of Canton, Mississippi et al
as 3:2011cv00676
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lousteau
Defendant:
City of Canton, Mississippi , William Truly and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Weber v. City of Canton et al
as 5:2010cv02077
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Weber
Defendant:
City of Canton, Charles Saler, Ryan Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Twedt v. Dupic et al
as 4:2010cv04028
Plaintiff:
David Twedt
Defendant:
Adam Dupic and City of Canton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz v. City of Canton, Ohio et al
as 5:2010cv00460
Plaintiff:
Laura Ruiz
Defendant:
City of Canton, Ohio, James Riddell, Dean McKimm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv04175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
