Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
FL State Conf of Branches & Youth Units, et al v. Florida Secretary of State, et al
as 23-12308
Plaintiff / Appellee: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, VOTERS OF TOMORROW ACTION INC, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellant: FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. BYRD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00215
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, EQUAL GROUND EDUCATION FUND, VOTERS OF TOMORROW ACTION, INC. and others
Defendant: CORD BYRD, ASHLEY MOODY, KIM BARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHEN et al v. SIMPSON et al
as 4:2023cv00208
Plaintiff: YIFAN SHEN, ZHIMING XU, XINXI WANG and others
Defendant: WILTON SIMPSON, MEREDITH IVEY, PATRICIA FITZGERALD and others
Amicus Curiae: FRED T KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY AT SEATTLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION LAW POLICY AND JUSTICE AT RUTGERS LAW SCHOOL, AOKI CENTER FOR CRITICAL RACE AND NATION STUDIES AT UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Means et al v. DeSoto Parish et al
as 5:2023cv00669
Plaintiff: David B. Means, Ryan Dupree, Robert G. Burford and others
Defendant: DeSoto Parish, DeSoto Parish Police Jury, Parish of DeSoto and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Defense Fund, Louisiana State Conference of the N A A C P and DeSoto Parish Branch of the N A A C P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC et al v. BYRD
as 4:2023cv00165
Plaintiff: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND INC and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP
Defendant: CORD BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClure et al v. Jefferson County Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff: Cara McClure, Birmingham Ministries, Metro-Birmingham Branch of the NAACP, The and others
Defendant: Jefferson County Commission, James A. Stephens, T. Joe Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Assurance Wireless USA, L.P., et al v. Alice Reynolds, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15490
Plaintiff / Appellant: ASSURANCE WIRELESS USA, L.P., METROPCS CALIFORNIA, LLC, SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALICE B. REYNOLDS, President of the California Public Utilities Commission, in her official capacity, KAREN DOUGLAS, Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, in her official capacity, DARCIE L. HOUCK, Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: MULTICULTURAL MEDIA, TELECOM AND INTERNET COUNCIL, ALLVANZA, CALIFORNIA HAWAII STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, and LATINO JUSTICE PRLDEF
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01121
Plaintiff: South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, Marvin Neal, Robynne Campbell and others
Defendant: Alan Wilson
Amicus Curiae: Rebecca L. Sandefur and Institute for Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff: VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant: CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?