Cases 31 - 40 of 78
SEARCY et al v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00815
Defendant:
LINDA ASHBY and CORIZON, INC.
Plaintiff:
LINDA SEARCY and DIANE TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
A.W. v. Walden et al
as 1:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
A. W.
Defendant:
Mark Walden, John/Jane Does, Geo Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sillas v. Geo Group, Inc., et al.
as 1:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Sillas
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Corizon, Inc., , Mark Elliot Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
C. G. et al v. Walden et al
as 1:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
C. G. , P. P. , M. T. and others
Defendant:
Mark Walden, John/Jane Does, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00850
Plaintiff:
Tamel Dixon
Defendant:
City of New York , Corizon Health, Inc., Corizon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Guadalupe County et al
as 1:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
Christopher Martinez
Defendant:
Guadalupe County , Geo Group, Inc. , Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mosley et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 1:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Janet Mosley , Nevada Mosley , Breanna Mosley and others
Defendant:
State of Missouri , Corizon, Inc. , Ian Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2014cv01688
Plaintiff:
Janet Mosley , Nevada Mosley , Breanna Mosley and others
Defendant:
State of Missouri , Corizon, Inc. , Ian Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
