Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Esquivel v. Werner Enterprises Inc et al
as 5:2018cv01521
Plaintiff:
Mario Esquivel
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises Inc and Drivers Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Canada, a/k/a Kaira Canada v. Hall et al
as 1:2018cv02121
Defendant:
Curtis Weathersby, Chante P. Hall, C.O. Popp (Star # 16251) and others
Plaintiff:
Gaddis Canada, a/k/a Kaira Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenoir v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv00974
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lenoir
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Noel Esquivel and Carlos Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armando Sandoval v. City of San Fernando et al
as 2:2016cv08924
Defendant:
Peter Aguirre, City of San Fernando, Evelyn Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Sandoval
Hung Lam v. City of San Jose, et al
as 16-16052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HUNG LAM, individually, through his next friend, Kathy Lam
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, a municipal corporation, DONDI WEST, individually and in her official position as a San Jose Police Officer and LARRY ESQUIVEL, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of San Jose
Larkin v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Chrylena Larkin
Defendant:
Eaton, County of, Eaton County Sheriff Department, Lansing Mall, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ato D Walker v. City of San Jose
as 5:2015cv04954
Plaintiff:
Ato D Walker
Defendant:
City Of San Jose, Larry Esquivel, Matthew Rowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
