Cases 31 - 40 of 1,357
Ceballos v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Florencio Ceballos
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., Universal Protection Service, LLC, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALVAREZ v. HOME DEPOT USA INC
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ALVAREZ
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and HOME DEPOT USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cole v. Diversified Maintenance et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cole
Defendant:
Diversified Maintenance, Home Depot, Best Buy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Teron v. Home Depot Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
MARIA TERON
Defendant:
Home Depot Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
