Cases 31 - 40 of 1,252
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Office of Aging/Adult Protective Services et al
as 1:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Mary Fore Lee
Defendant:
Office of Aging/Adult Protective Services, Attorney General Chris Carr, Bill Westenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Tulis v. William Orange, et al
as 23-5804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JONATHAN TULIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ORANGE, CITY OF FRANKLIN, TN, ATRIUM HOSPITALITY, LP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROBERTS v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2023cv16144
Plaintiff:
SHAREENAH ROBERTS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, COUNTY OF ESSEX, POLICE OFFICER LLOYD MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, John Doe Officers 1-10 and John Doe Entities 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Gavigan et al
as 1:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pierce
Defendant:
Marie Gavigan, State of Hawaii, John Does No. 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTIAGO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROSARIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
