Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Johnson v. Nocco et al
as 8:2020cv01370
Defendant:
James Dunn and Chris Nocco
Plaintiff:
Marques A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Yarbrough v. La Marque Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00072
Defendant:
La Marque Police Department and AJ Skaggs
Plaintiff:
Brian Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Martin v. Murfreesboro TN, Rutherford County
as 3:2019cv00914
Plaintiff:
Marques D. Martin
Defendant:
Murfreesboro TN, Rutherford County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paloma Bell et al v. Chris Jones et al
as 2:2019cv06886
Plaintiff:
PALOMA BELL and MICHAEL COSCHIGANO
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DOES 1-50,, ALVIN MARQUES, #39005 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ellsworth v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
as 4:2019cv00034
Plaintiff:
Amanda Ellsworth
Defendant:
City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, City of Broken Arrow Police Officers 1-10 and Marque Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Aunty's Market China Town Hawaii LLC. HI et al v. Amoguis Clans et al
as 1:2019cv00025
Defendant:
BE MYLENE AND MARLENE ACOSTA Families, DOE FALLS WITNESSES, Karen Antonio and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Howell, Leticia Tamayo and Aunty's Market China Town Hawaii LLC. HI
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Brown et al v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2018cv06459
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company, Linden Webster, Andrew Moringiellos and others
Plaintiff:
James Brown and Lionel Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dong Huang v. Jalea Hill, et al
as 18-40608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONG SHENG HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
JALEA JOECHELLE HILL, KAREA MARIE WILLIAMS, MURPHY OIL USA, INCORPORATED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
