Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01566
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Willis v. O'Shea et al
as 3:2020cv50291
Defendant:
Brandon Mather, Dan O'Shea, Andrew Kennington and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Pickens et al
as 1:2020cv03209
Defendant:
Dr. Edward Spurka, Judge John Mather, Dorothy A. Pettes and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anthony Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Stroeder v. Service Employees International Union, Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union et al
as 3:2019cv01181
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union, Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union, Katy Coba, Paul Mather and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Stroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciervo et al v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2019cv04075
Plaintiff:
Rosina Ciervo and Celena McDaniel
Defendant:
The County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv16560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Defendant:
MONSIGNOR LYNN, BARRY KNIGHT, KEN BRETT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
