Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv24592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harry Conner v. USPS, et al
as 16-6484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY CONNER, Designated Beneficiary & Sole Heir of Mary Conner Nelson (deceased)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Office of Worker's Compensation Program, METLIFE, INC. and others
Harry Conner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, et al
as 16-6167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harry Conner v. Metropolitan Life Ins Co, et al
as 16-5504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, METLIFE INC., JOHN DOE, Program Manager, Federal Employee's Group Life Insurance, Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv01776
Plaintiff:
Jay Cohen
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, North Shore Financial Group and Michael P Tuccillo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Conner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv02833
Plaintiff:
Harry Conner
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
