Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Charlotte Weatherford v. Nevada Rural Housing Authority, et al
as 13-16173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLOTTE WEATHERFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA RURAL HOUSING AUTHORITY (NRHA), HEIDI FETTIC, TERRY SMITH and others
State of Tennessee, et al v. Kathy Noble
as 13-5752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, WILLIAM HASLAM, SCOTT FOSTER, Hendersonville Mayor and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHY NOBLE
Adelman et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
Matt Adelman , Lisa Adelman , Brandie Adelman and others
Defendant:
Terri Smith, Mary Ann Maidl, Justin E Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Tennessee et al v. Noble
as 3:2013cv00295
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, William Haslam, Scott Foster and others
Defendant:
Kathy Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Smith v. Flinkfelt et al
as 3:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Terri Smith
Defendant:
Dan Flinkfelt , Henry County Animal Control and Henry County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Flinkfelt et al
as 3:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Terri Smith
Defendant:
Dan Flinkfelt , Henry County Animal Control and Henry County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Haugen et al
as 3:2012cv00249
Plaintiff:
William Terry Smith
Defendant:
John Haugen and Marc Okuley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. Woolfork et al
as 1:2012cv01281
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric McFarland
Defendant:
David L. Woolfork, Jimmy Harris, Rudder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
